|
Journal of Extension Systems
Article reprints (US $5/each) may be obtained by contacting the Academic Editor.

2001, Volume 17(2), December
-
Assessment of Hierarchical Structure of Cognitive Learning of Neo-Literate
Rural Women, Sumita Roy and Varinder Randhawa
-
Participatory Programming and Sustainable Development: A Workshop for Indian
Educators, Okechukwu Ukaga, Edwin F. Shinn,
Arlen Etling
-
Effectiveness of Maryland Nutrition Management Program in
Reducing Crop Nutrient Use by Livestock Farmers in Maryland, Jamal
Hosseini and William Rivera
-
Experiences of Public Sector Collaboration for Scaling Up Non Government
Organization (NGO) Rural Development Project in Mexico, Anibal Quispe
and Leobardo Jimenex-Sanchez
-
Survey of Agricultural Enterprises owned by Women Farmers in Botswana,
P. J. Squire and Ntshaliki Cecilia Moseki
-
Activities in Research-Extension-Farmers Linkage System in South Western
Nigeria, O. I. Oladele
-
Assessment of Methods of Training Farmers for the Implementation of Programmes
of Agricultural Development Project in Rivers State of Nigeria, A.
G. Eke and G. N. Emah
-
Gender Sensitization: Women in Agricultural Development, O.
S. Verma
-
NEW YORK – USA: Capitalizing on its Image as the Big Apple, O.
S. Verma

Entrepreneurship is not only the ability to successfully
predict future needs of the people but also produce goods and services
accordingly to satisfy these needs. Further, it needs constant evaluation of the
changing social and economic order. It also requires highest level of
imagination, creativity, and innovation. By and large, there is no dearth of the
people possessing these properties. In developing countries, however, a large
number of people with potential to develop entrepreneurship either sit idle or
wait for a job to come their way. Becoming an entrepreneur to earn a living and
thereby generate employment for others and also create assets for the whole
economy is not an option for them. An in-depth analysis of this stigma reveals
some of the reasons for entrepreneurship not gaining momentum.
-
Contempt for Labor: Mostly, people try to seek
external help for doing their odd jobs that they themselves can do with ease.
This is mainly because of their traditional contempt for labour. Manual work
for them is a social stigma. Such mental block affects the development of
entrepreneurship.
-
Lack of Capital: Developing countries have a lower
rate of savings and investments which in turn affects the rate of capital
formation. Capital is vital for every business. Its unavailability adversely
affects entrepreneurship spirit.
-
License: Economic environment is such that starting
and running a business is Herculean task. Sundry licenses, permits, and quota
all are roadblocks in the development of entrepreneurship. Government is the
entrepreneurs’ biggest enemy.
-
Education Systems: Education systems are simply
churning out hoards of office clerks. In schools and colleges, mindsets are
shaped for nothing but a job after graduation. Even the top management centers
are churning out managers conditioned to work for big corporations. There is
little emphasis on the development of entrepreneurship skills through
requisite training.
-
Parental Expectation: No sooner do parents send
their children to school than they expect him/her to become an officer in
government sector some day. Very few think of making their child an officer of
his/her own business.
-
Socialist Mindset: Socialistic economies have a bias
that anything concerned with money and creating wealth is a sin. Anyone doing
so is thought of as a thief by the society. This negative feeling has always
bogged down the mindset and hindered the growth of enterprising efforts.
-
Traditional Obsession: Traditional obsession with
government jobs prevents a large number of people from taking up employment in
private sector. Private sector is traditionally understood as a synonym for
extra income. Hence, people refrain from becoming a part of it as workers and
so also as entrepreneurs.
-
Familial Protection: In a society of joint-families,
non employed member of the family is considered a boon to do small odd jobs.
This is detrimental to personal development of the individual.
-
Cultural Values:
Despite lucrative feasibility of a business, it does not get public and social
acceptance mainly because cultural values do not approve it. For instance,
Piggery is a very profitable venture but because it is a caste-tied avocation,
it is not taken up by people other than lower categories of scheduled castes.
-
Youths Unwillingness:
Despite having a large population of unemployed youths in almost all the
countries around the world, entrepreneurship as a career has not been picked
up by them. They are not willing to come forward for developing their own
business. Thus, the bottom line is that instead of thinking of joining others’
business, youths should be motivated to create and find employment avenues by
their own efforts. Business always does not mean a multi-million corporation.
Something as humble as a small shop catering to local needs is still better
than no employment at all.
So, why join others’ business? Why not your own? It is
high time entrepreneurship as a career becomes a common phenomenon. In the
developed countries, concept of private sector has taken center stage long ago
and entrepreneurship has become a great success. In the United States, for
instance, Venture Capital Outlays which fuel new business has registered a
200-fold increase in a short period of 10 years. While 1000 largest US companies
eliminated one million jobs, smaller innovative Companies added 20 million jobs
over the same period. So, small is beautiful. Another viable option is that
non-traditional career should be considered to counter unemployment. But before
you have what it takes to succeed, map your aptitude for entrepreneurship. Here
is a 10-question entrepreneurship test for you. Each question in this 10
question battery carries three options. You tick only one of these which is
typically characteristic of you.
1.
Are you a self-starter?
a.
If someone gets me started, I might go alright.
b.
I do things
my own way. Nobody needs to tell me to get going.
c.
I do not
put myself until I am asked to do it.
2.
How do you feel about other people?
a.
Most people puzzle me.
b.
I can
get along with just about anybody.
c.
I do
not need anybody else. I already have enough friends.
3.
Can you lead others?
a.
I can get people to do things if I am in the driver’s seat.
b.
I can
get most people to go along with me without much difficulty.
c.
I
usually let someone else get things moving.
4.
Can you take responsibility?
a.
I will take if I have to but I would rather let someone else take the
responsibility.
b.
There is
always some eager person around waiting to show off, I say let him.
c.
I like
to accept responsibility and see things done through.
5.
How good organizer are you?
a.
I like to have a plan before I start. I am usually the one who lines
up the things.
b.
I do all
unless things get too complicated. Then, I may opt out.
c.
I just
take things as they come.
6.
How good worker are you?
a.
I do not see hard work can lead you anywhere.
b.
I work
hard when I have enough time. That’s it.
c.
I can
keep going as long as necessary. I do not mind working extra hours.
7.
Can you make decisions?
a.
I can if I have plenty of time.
b.
I can
make up my mind quickly if necessary to make quick decisions.
c.
I do
not like to be the one who decides things in hurry.
8.
Can people trust what you say?
a.
I try to be on their level but sometimes I just say what is easiest.
b.
I do not
say things I do not mean. They, therefore, surely trust me.
c.
I
always say what I think is right. If they do not understand the difference,
it is their fault.
9.
Can you stick with?
a.
If I make up my mind to do something, I do not let anything stop me.
b.
If a job
does not go right, I turn it off. Why beat others brain?
c.
I
usually finish what I start.
10.
Can you keep record?
a.
Records are not important. I know what is needed without keeping
records.
b.
I can
but it is more important to work out things that to shuffle numbers.
c.
Since
they are needed, I will keep records even though I do not want to.
SCORE-CARD
Question
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
|
1 |
5 |
10 |
3 |
|
2 |
3 |
10 |
5 |
|
3 |
3 |
10 |
5 |
|
4 |
5 |
3 |
10 |
|
5 |
10 |
5 |
3 |
|
6 |
3 |
5 |
10 |
|
7 |
5 |
10 |
3 |
|
8 |
5 |
10 |
3 |
|
9 |
5 |
3 |
10 |
|
10 |
3 |
5 |
10 |
GRADING
Score 100: Excellent
A perfect score. You are a born entrepreneur. If you are
not presently running your own business you should definitely start one, the
sooner the better. You are on the way to fame and riches.
Score 91-99: Very Good
You definitely have what it takes to succeed in a
business of your own. Do not hesitate. Your ways to success in business are
wide open.
Score 72-90: Good
You have the qualities of a successful entrepreneur with
some weak spots. Identify your deficiency. You should be able to cover that
deficiency by either retraining yourself or hiring someone with the necessary
skill.
Score 41-71: So-So
The prospect of your success in a business of your own is
questionable. You have some deficiencies that might out-shadow some good
traits you have. If you still want to go on with it, be sure to call up all
the persistence you can get. You are going to face some tough adversity on the
way.
Score 40 and below: Most Unsatisfactory
Forget your dreams of being your own boss. You should
better keep secure job. Why bother with all the risks and hustles of starting
a business.
Back to Top

Assessment of Hierarchical Structure of
Cognitive Learning of Neo-Literate Rural Women, Sumita Roy and Varinder
Randhawa, 1-14.
As an educational approach, the present investigation
attempted to promote cognitive learning in neo-literate rural women towards
maternal and child nutrition. The approach was based on modular instruction
where a set of capsules was used on respective content areas. These capsules
were used for promoting cognitive learning through personal and impersonal mode
of intervention. The personal mode was face-to-face instruction through lecture
and for impersonal mode the video-taped lectures were delivered. In both the
intervention modes, a moduled instructional booklet was distributed for
self-reading after the exposure to respective content. The intervention was
carried out through randomized control group pre-test post-test experimental
research design. The scores obtained through criterion referenced mastery test
showed differential pattern of cognitive learning for respective capsules in
both the modes of intervention. The cognitive learning was according to the
order of difficulty from simple to complex and also followed a hierarchy where
knowledge formed the base for comprehension and then application was
subsequently built upon each in a hierarchical manner.
Back to Top

Participatory Programming and
Sustainable Development: A Workshop for Indian Educators, Okechukwu
Ukaga, Edwin F. Shinn and Arlen Etling, 15-27.
After much talk about participatory rural assessment, a
number of articles and papers by AIAEE members, and a training manual, a
particular university is taking the concepts to field workers. International
Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) at Colorado State University (CSU),
working with the HELPO Foundation, Pune, India, initiated a collaborative
workshop for participatory program and community development. IISD and HELPO
Foundation organized a four-week training entitled “Participatory Processes for
Sustainable Development” (PPSD) of local community development practitioners in
Pune, India, whose previous education and training were largely authoritarian
and hierarchical. The participants not only rated the workshop very positively
but also actually implemented participatory methods in their community
development work. A year after the workshop, most participants were still using
participatory approaches.
Back to Top

Effectiveness of Maryland Nutrient
Management Program in Reducing Crop Nutrient Use by Livestock Farmers in
Maryland, Jamal Hosseini and William Rivera, 28-40.
The sample for the study included 250 livestock farmers.
The research design included a survey strategy and mail questionnaire. Data were
analyzed using multiple regression and content analysis. The response rate for
the study was 135 livestock farmers. The majority of livestock farmers (95
respondents) indicated that they implemented the NMP on at least 50 percent of
their farmland. The results show a majority of livestock farmers decreased the
amount of commercial nitrogen applied to their crops especially those engaged in
corn adopt practices recommended by the NMP. In addition, forty-one livestock
farmers indicated that they implemented the NMP practices in order to reduce
water pollution in Maryland. While majority of respondents (98 respondents)
believed that there is water pollution in Maryland, they did not consider the
agricultural sector to be a primary contributor to non-point source pollution.
Livestock farmers perceive the NMP in a very favorable light. Those using manure
(121 respondents) and those using chemical fertilizers (123 respondents) stated
that the NMP helped them to use manure and chemical fertilizers more
efficiently. The study arrived at two main findings. First, the NMP is effective
in persuading livestock farmers to use crop nutrients more efficiently; and
second, livestock farmers’ perception of the NMP is very favorable, although
they desire more frequent and regular farm visits by extension consultants.
Back to Top

Experiences of Public Sector
Collaboration for Scaling Up Non Governmental Organization (NGO) Rural
Development Projects in Mexico, Anibal Quispe and Leobardo
Jimenez-Sanchez, 41-51.
In the last ten years, the number of NGO rural development
projects has been increasing in Mexico. Many of them have been successful in
their pilot phase of 3 years. Evaluation studies questioned how to deal with
these projects in order to expand the experiences to other communities. In
response to this, in Mexico the representatives of some NGO projects and state
programs decided to share resources for scaling up. This evaluative research
identified some evidence of the scaling-up results and the processes of six
projects. A survey method, face to face interview, and direct observation were
used to collect information from the beneficiary small farmers, technicians,
coordinators of the projects, and representatives of the state programs. Two of
the six projects were very successful for scaling-up their experiences because
of the successful linkages; while one of them mostly linked with the state
program, the other one did it with the local institutions and organizations. For
other two projects, the scaling-up experiences were fairly successful; and for
the last one, there were no scaling-up results. Eight factors were identified
that favored or hindered the results: 1) the quality performance of the Ngo
staff; 2) the degree of communication between the project and program personnel;
3) the financial and other resources of NGOs; 4) the resources availability of
the government programs for the projects; 5) the degree of participation and
organization of the farmers in the project; 6) the expectations of the new
beneficiaries of the technologies and experiences of the projects; 7) the nature
of the introduced technologies and organization; and 8) the socio-economic and
political context in which the projects were operating.
Back to Top

A Survey of Agricultural Enterprises
Owned by Women Farmers in Botswana, P. J.
Squire and Ntshaliki Cecilia Moseki, 52-62.
The study was a descriptive survey research. Face-to-face
interview schedule was used to collect data from a random sample of the
accessible study population. The findings showed that the majority of women
farmers were relatively young and manage small scale traditional agricultural
enterprises on their own land, but earn less than P5000 per annum from their
farm investments. In order to empower women farmers to manage their enterprises
better and become more productive, it is recommended that: (1) soft loans and
other production inputs be made available to the women as independent investors,
(2) the agricultural extension services be strengthened to make it more
responsive to the needs of women, (3) marketing outlets be provided for the
women’s agricultural produce, and (4) current agricultural products pricing
policies be reviewed to reflect the high costs of production, processing
marketing.
Back to Top

Activities in Research – Extension – Farmers Linkage System in South Western
Nigeria, O. I. Oladele, 63-75.
Linkage between
researchers, extension agents, and farmers play a vital role in agricultural
development. This study analyzed the activities of the components of linkage
system in South Western Nigeria. Data were collected through the aid of
structured questionnaires from samples that were drawn randomly from researchers
(88), extension agents (115) and farmers (271). The results of the study show
that problem identification (87.8 percent) is the most prominent linkage
activity of both the researchers and extension agents. No significant difference
was recorded for the linkage activities across the institutes that were
interviewed. The paper concludes that other activities on the linkage scale
should be intensified in order to reap the maximum benefits of these linkage
types and functions.
Back to Top

Assessment of Methods of Training Farmers for the Implementation of Programmes
of Agricultural Development Project in Rivers State of Nigeria, A.
G. Eke and G. N. Emah, 76-82.
The study examines the
perception of farmers on methods of training needed for successful
implementation of Agricultural Development programmes in Rivers State. A total
of eleven methods were examined and seven were ascertained as most important to
the training needs of farmers.
Back to Top

Gender Sensitization – Women in Agricultural Development,
O. S. Verma, 83-93.
(No Abstract Available)

New
York-USA – Capitalizing on its Image as the Big Apple,
Complied & Edited by Dr. O. S. Verma, 94-97.
(No Abstract Available)
|