|
2007, V.23-Dec
2007, V.23-Jun
2006, V.22-Dec 2006, V.22-Jun 2005, V.21-Dec 2005, V.21-Jun 2004, V.20-Dec 2004, V.20-Jun 2003, V.19-Dec 2003, V.19-Jun 2002, V.18-Dec 2002, V.18-Jun 2001, V.17-Dec 2001, V.17-Jun 2000, V.16-Dec 2000, V.16-Jun 1999, V.15-Dec 1999, V.15-Jun 1998, V.14-Dec 1998, V.14-Jun 1997, V.13 1996, V.12-Dec 1996, V.12-Jun 1995, V.11-Dec 1995, V.11-Jun 1994, V.10-Dec 1994, V.10-Jun 1993, V.09-Dec 1993, V.09-Jun 1992, V.08 1991, V.07-Dec 1991, V.07-Jul 1990, V.06-Dec 1990, V.06-Jun 1989, V.05-Dec 1989, V.05-Jun 1988, V.04-Dec 1988, V.04-Jun 1987, V.03-Dec 1987, V.03-Jun 1986, V.02-Dec 1986, V.02-Jun 1985, V.01
| |
Journal of Extension Systems
Article reprints (US $5/each) may be obtained by contacting the Academic Editor.

1986, Volume 2, December
O. S. Verma, Editorial
- Verma, O. S. Communication Quotient: A Scale Devised to
Measure Personal Influence.
- Lionberger, H. F. Functional Requirements
for Agricultural Research-Extension Systems: A Mix of RD & D and IPPS Sub-systems.
- Singh, L. & R. K. Sharma. Rice Production
Systems: Neck-deep of Constraints Causing Concern to Paddy Growers.
- Reddy, K. P. Extension Systems Interaction with
Research and Client Systems: An Inter-System Analysis.
- Rani, A. & A. Malaviya. Media Mix Systems: Low
Cost Nutritious Recipes Communication: Method Demonstration-cum-Flip-Chart the Best.
- Kakoty, H. N. & T. S. Sohal. Cross-Breeding
Systems and Management Inputs: A Valency of Incentives to Small Dairy Farmers.
- Chowdhary, M., H. Nand & Makhija, V. K. Contact
Farmers Under T & V System: Conformity to the Roles Expected.
- Pathak, S. & A. K. Majumdar. Communicators'
Attributes: Determinants of Communication Fidelity.
- Singh, G. & J. Kaur. Farm Advisory Services: A
Beacon of Land Grant UniversitiesHaryana Agricultural University: A Case in Point.
- Karami, E. Agricultural Extension in Development
Theory: Some Conceptual and Empirical Considerations.
- De, D. & G. S. Bangarva. Wheat Production
Technology: Cost-Incentive Dormant Technical Knowhow.
- Verma, O. S. & V. V. Bhaskar. Scientists'
Productivity: A Sum Total of Research, Teaching, Extension and Miscellaneous
Activities-Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment Systems.

For the last several decades, we have been heavily relying on Sociometry
for identification of opinion leaders in our societies. Although O.S. Verma in his paper
entitled "Communication Quotient" has devised a new scale to locate influential
leaders in village societies, he too initially used Sociometric Technique in raw data
collection. He has claimed that his CQ-scale can be used in a wide variety of group
situations under certain assumptions. It can be a political party, a club, an association,
a society, a village, and even a town. The impetus to this kind of research is indeed the
land-mark in interpersonal interactions.
In his article, Prof. Lionberger has focussed squarely on functional requisites of
information systems, their importance and implications for research-extension system
planning. His RD & D and IPPS sub-systems mix is basically an information generating,
transforming, and disseminating-use system and not Extension as a whole. His functional
model is, therefore, a part of the series. Need still exists to develop: (1) Structural
Management Model of Extension Systems, (2) Academic Discipline model, (3) Resources model,
(4) Knowledge systems model, and (5) Administrative Control systems model. Some body has
to put his weight on this challenge.
In rice production systems, Labh Singh and R.K. Sharma found several very important
constraints that are faced by majority of Indian farmers. They have chiefly reported that
the high cost of production inputs, inadequacy of supplementary factors, non-provision of
regulated markets, and lack of technical guidance have been the major constraints which
have adversely affected the rice production potential of Paddy growers. Almost similar
findings have also been reported by Dipak De and G.S. Bangarva in their "Wheat
Production Technology" article. They found that 75 per cent gap in wheat technology
utilization is mainly attributed not only to high cost of production factors like
fertilizers, herbicides, and agro-chemicals but also to dormant technical know-how of the
farmers. These findings, therefore, only suggest that the cost reduction mechanism and
strengthening of extension agencies network, a two-pronged strategy, need to be geared or
constraint-tree wheat and rice production systems.
Inter-systems analysis carried out by Pandarinath Reddy indicates that practically all
the methods and media that provide access to the latest research developments in the field
of science and technology have been extremely low on the part of extension personnel. In
his paper Dr. Reddy has, therefore, suggested that organising frequent seminars and
workshops for extension personnel especially for the village level functionaries, to
exchange ideas with the scientists, is a need of the hour. He has further suggested that
the potential sources of communicative interactions like field days, exhibitions, cattle
fairs, film shows, and publications should frequently provide a platform to extension
workers so as to get them into the mainstream of technology diffusion process.
Although in their study on Media-mix systems, Asha Rani and A. Malaviya have reported
that Flip-Chart and Flash-Cards when mixed with Method Demonstration are the most
effective systems in increasing knowledge and knowledge retention, doubts still persist as
to whether the knowledge gain and retention is a permanent feature month after month and
year after year. It is also to be seen whether this finding is true in different settings
with different technologies on different clientele.
The only Dairy stream paper comes from H.N. Kakoty and T.S. Sohal on
"Cross-Breeding Systems and Management Inputs". Authors have reported that the
cross-bred catle is the largest single incentive force which has aroused desire in small
farmers to own a dairy farm. It is further claimed that with modern management inputs the
cross-bred cattle farming systems can give a fillip to India's dairy development
programmer. These two gamuts are found to have caused adoption of modern farm technology
to the extent of 85 per cent and are, therefore, a valency of incentives to small dairy
farmers.
These days, a lot has been talked about T & V System. The study conducted by
Chowdhary, Hiranand, and Makhija on "Contact Farmers Conformity to the Roles
Expected" has been a stepping stone in the right perspective. However, it could have
been a befitting reference had the authors read luminous material on T&V System
published by a seeded Rural Sociologist, Dr. Michael M. Cernea of World Bank. His volumes
notably: (1) Agricultural Extension by Training and Visit SystemThe Asian
Experience, (2) Research-Extension-FarmerA Two-way Continuum, and (3) Putting People
First-Sociological Variables in Rural Development: are really domain in the field of
extension systems practice. I have all praise for Dr. Cernea for these valuable
publications.
In order to make extension personnel more effective in their communication pursuits, it
is imperative to improve their communication skill, develop in them a desirable attitude,
and advance their knowledge base. In their paper, S. Pathak and A. K. Mazumdar have found
that these three attributes together can predict communicator's fidelity to the extent of
63 per cent. Their suggestion that these traits can be enhanced through T & V system
appears to be quite relevant. However, developing twin virtues like need achievement and
need to promote common good are equally significant systems to achieve improvements in
communication behaviour.
Farm Advisory Service has been an integral component of Land Grant University System.
In their article, Gian Singh and Jasbir Kaur have reported that Haryana Agricultural
University is a beacon of Land Grant Universities. The HAU Farm Advisory Service has been
delivering farm goods at the door-steps of 3 lakh farmers every year through eleven Krishi
Gyan Kendras spread over eleven district headquarters. The lab to land programme is said
to have doubled the farm yield of poor farm families. These are indeed staggering
achievements.
Several development theories are now available in literature. Agricultural Extension
has a number of Systems working at present on one or the other dimensions of these
theories. It, however, still could not make any head-way impact on rural development. This
view is argued by Ezatollah Karami in his article "Agricultural Extension in
Development Theory". He commented that this failure is largely attributed to the
questionable validity of Extension Organisations. In addition, he partly blamed
Diffusionists as they too could not provide us the suitable theoretical background for
building Agricultural Extension Systems. He has, therefore, suggested that derivation of
some alternative concepts together with their empirical base is a necessity for extension
model building. He worked along these lines and found that Integrated Rural Development
approach adopted by the Rural Service Centres in Iran did not take several independent
variables (like land-man ratio, village development parameters, and wheat production per
household etc.) into account while planning and implementing extension programmes. This is
where we have to devise our Agricultural Extension approach in rural development.
It will not be an exaggeration if we confer the title "Academic Excellence"
on the PAS-Scale developed by O.S. Verma and V.V. Bhaskar for assessing scientists
productivity. In the present day crisis of Confidential Report Systems, particularly in
research-based organizations, the PAS-Scale can really bring a sigh of relief to a number
of scientists who have been the victims of subjective assessment. This Scale will perhaps
have world-wide implications, at least in methodological terms. However, I feel, further
research is still called for in two dimensions: (1) Time allocation to various research
steps delineated in Table 3, and (2) Fixation of Norms on number of papers/articles a
scientist should publish every year. The PERTICPM technique can work out the time
allocation and Delphi technique can offer solutions to the norm fixation problem.
Back to Top

Verma, O. S. Communication Quotient: A Scale Devised
to Measure Personal Influence, 10-20.
In all groups, large or small, personal influence
has been largely vested in a few hands who are always sought after in almost all arena of
group activities. Those hands are called as Key-communicators (Singh, 1965 and Shankeriah,
1969), Polymorphic Opinion Leaders (Merton, 1949), Opinion Leaders (Rogers, 1964), and
Multiple Area Communicators (Verma, 1970). For quite long, identification of these
influentials has been a matter of controversy as no two studies have adopted a single
approach. In this paper, attempts are made to devise a unified single instrument to locate
influential persons in a society.
Back to Top

Lionberger, H. F. Functional
Requirements for Agricultural Research-Extension Systems: A Mix of RD & D and IPPS
Sub-systems, 21-31.
Functions that must be performed by any system to service the specialty informational
needs of people are abstracted from: (1) the 100 year land grant (people service)
university experience, (2) research on how such systems operate, and (3) on how people
arrive at "thought out" adoption decisions. These functional requisites are
presented as basic referents for assessing the adequacy of any system to supply science
based specialty information to people. The functional sequences are regarded as universal
musts. The two sub-systems together, the RD & D and the associated IPPS, are able to
address about any kind of information generation use problem that arises (Lionberger and
Gwin, 1983). Neither sub-system alone will suffice as experiences clearly show. Failure to
properly address information generation problems of user clienteles is likely to be a
governance not a system adequacy problem.
Back to Top

Singh, L. & R. K. Sharma. Rice
Production Systems: Neck-deep of Constraints Causing Concern to Paddy Growers, 32-35.
Almost 80 per cent paddy growers in Kurukshetra district of Haryana State are buried
neck-deep with several constraints which have badly affected their rice production
potential. Production inputs are beyond their reach simply because the cost of these
inputs is exorbitant. Supplementary factors like electricity for running tube-wells,
diesel for engines, and labour for farm operations are all not only costly but also
scarce. Marketing of their produce has been exploited by the traders and the farmers have
not been provided with technical guidance as to how to get rid of this exploitation. These
findings, therefore, apparently suggest that there is an urgent need of a constraint free
tactical planning for paddy growers so as to tap up their rice production potential.
Technology break-through alone is not enough unless it matches with the farmers
utilization systems.
Back to Top

Reddy, K. P. Extension Systems
Interaction with Research and Client Systems: An Inter-System Analysis, 36-42.
In India, extension personnel in general and para-veterinary village level
functionaries in particular have almost no access to modern methods of research
communication systems. This fact is corroborated by the findings of this study carried out
in Andhra Pradesh Department of Animal Husbandry. The methods and media that provide
access to the latest developments in the field of Science and Technology are poorly
exposed to extension personnel right from district level headquarters to grassroot village
level structure. Their interaction with farmers via farmer-oriented communication systems,
however, is tolerable, The three media: (1) Farm and Home visits, (2) Office calls, and
(3) Meetings are found to be quite effective for EP-FC interactions.
Back to Top

Rani, A. & A. Malaviya. Media Mix
Systems: Low Cost Nutritious Recipes Communication: Method Demonstration-cum-Flip-Chart
the Best, 43-45.
Comprehension power of Indian illiterate rural women is not disappointing especially
when compared with Indian School going youths of today. A sizeable 10 per cent young rural
women in Hisar district of Haryana State have shown a complete 100 per cent retention of
technical know-how on low-cost nutritious food recipes technology when communicated
through Method Demonstration -cum-Flip -Chart. By any standard, this is a remarkable
performance Data presented in Table 1 on relative effectiveness of different media-mix
systems show that besides Flip-chart, the Flashcards mixed with Method Demonstration has
also been equally effective in technology introduction programmes. These findings,
therefore, suggest that the village extension workers should invariably make use of
Flip-chart and Flash-cards in their technology communication pursuits particularly when
dealing with rural women.
Back to Top

Kakoty, H. N. & T. S. Sohal. Cross-Breeding
Systems and Management Inputs: A Valency of Incentives to Small Dairy Farmers,
46-49.
In order to give a fillip to India's dairy development programmes, it is imperative to
increase the valence of cross-breeding systems with modern management inputs. This is so
because majority of small farmers have perceived cattle breeding a single external force
which has aroused in them a desire to adopt dairy farming. This is a largest single factor
which has consequential effect on the adoption of all other subsequent factors of
production. It is evident by the fact that 85 per cent of the total variation in
technology adoption is explained by this factor alone.
Back to Top

Chowdhary, M., H. Nand & Makhija, V. K. Contact Farmers Under T & V System: Conformity to the Roles Expected,
50-54.
Under T & V System of Extension, some farmers are conferred a status of Contact
Farmers who are expected to play certain roles. In this study, five such roles are
identified as presented in the Table. The data show that almost in all these five roles,
well over 70 per cent contact farmers turned up to be what they were expected of: (1)
opinion leadership, (2) real farmership, (3) farmers representative, (4) demonstrating
willingness, and (5) diffused influence. Conformity to the roles expected of the contact
farmers is, therefore, kept as high as 70 per cent. It appears a sizeable 30 per cent
contact farmers were wrongly chosen as they did not conform to any of these five roles
they were expected of.
Back to Top

Pathak, S. & A. K. Majumdar. Communicators'
Attributes: Determinants of Communication Fidelity, 55-59.
The effectiveness of extension personnel largely depends upon the quality of their own
attributes like communication skill, knowledge level, and attitude orientation. This study
carried out on 30 extension workers in West Bengal has found that these three attributes
together predicted communicator's fidelity to the extent of 63 per cent. Extension workers
who are poorly equipped with the encoding- decoding skills, acquired sub-standard
knowledge, and carried indifferent attitude turned up less effective in their
communication pursuits. Perhaps these traits can be enhanced through T&V systems.
Back to Top

Singh, G. & J. Kaur. Farm Advisory
Services: A Beacon of Land Grant UniversitiesHaryana Agricultural University: A Case
in Point, 58-60.
The ICAR Lab-to-Land programme has resulted in doubling the farm yield of 1400 poor
families adopted by the Haryana Agricultural University in just one year. The
University-run KGKs located at 11 district headquarters are delivering farm good to 3.04
lakh farmers every year through various farm advisory services. This has induced farm
skill acquisition in 45.7 per cent of them. Modernization in Farm technology utilization,
however, has been dismal at only 15 per cent.
Back to Top

Karami, E. Agricultural Extension in
Development Theory: Some Conceptual and Empirical Considerations, 61-69.
Agricultural Extension has not made the head-way impact on rural development as
expected in many under-developed countries. This failure can be largely attributed to the
questionable validity of Extension organisations. It can partly be questioned as
diffusionists approach as they have not provided the suitable theoretical ground for
building Agricultural Extension Systems. Derivation of alternative concepts therefore, is
a necessity for understanding planning, implementation and evaluation of Extension Systems
and rural development programmes. In this article, attempts are made to suggest some
empirical base for such extension model building.
Back to Top

De, D. & G. S. Bangarva. Wheat
Production Technology: Cost-Incentive Dormant Technical Knowhow, 70-73.
Wheat production technologies appear to have not generated goods to the expected of
average Indian farmers. It is evident by the findings of this study carried out in Jaipur
district of Rajasthan which reveals that despite two decades of green revolution more than
75 per cent gap in technology utilization is still existing on the farms of 75 per cent
farmers. This gap is mainly because the production factors like fertilizers, herbicides,
and agro-chemicals are not only costly in relation to the returns but also because the
technical know-how are still deficient on the part of farmers. This obviously draws
attention of agricultural scientists towards the fact that location specific adaptive
research is very much need of the hour. Similarly, in order to furnish the farmers with
the latest technical know how, extension agencies need to gear up their specialty
informational systems.
Back to Top

Verma, O. S. & V. V. Bhaskar. Scientists'
Productivity: A Sum Total of Research, Teaching, Extension and Miscellaneous
Activities-Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment Systems, 74-89.
Assessment systems of Scientists' productivity has been a subjective exercise in the
past. The subjectivity element superseded objectivity merely because there was perhaps no
ready-made mathematical formula available which could have been applied for appraising the
scientists' performance. In this paper, attempts are made to construct such formula based
on actual work done by the scientists in their research, teaching, extension, and
miscellaneous assignments. The formula so developed called as PAS Scale takes fifty-fifty
per cent care of quantity and quality aspects of scientists achievements. Productivity is
viewed as a ratio between the marks a scientist makes in his research + teaching +
extension + miscellaneous activities (Outputs) during a given period of time and the
Maximum Marks he has the probability to achieve (Inputs). Research productivity is a
function of Research Project Score and Publications Marks obtained in a particular period.
Back to Top
|